Guru's Verification engine ensures consistency, confidence, and trust in the knowledge your organization shares. Learn more.

Student Code of Conduct - 25. Grievance Process for Non-Title IX Allegations

Upon completion of an investigation, the Title IX Investigator will prepare a report for review by the Vice Provost for Student Success, Associate Provost for Student Affairs , and Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards to determine if the evidence and information is sufficient to move forward with a Conduct Panel Review or if the incident will be dismissed.

  • A formal notice of charges will be sent to the respondent and complainant.
  • The university will proceed with the live hearing in the absence of any party and may reach a determination of responsibility.
  • The hearing will be conducted live/virtually in real time.
  • A panel of decision makers will render the decision in the hearing.
  • Parties may choose to be accompanied by an advisor or support person of choice. The advisor/support person cannot actively participate in the hearing. Students may request an advisor from The Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards.
  • Both parties will be present for the duration of the hearing but will not communicate with each other.
  • Each party will give opening statements and closing statements to the panel.
  • Relevant witnesses will be questioned by the panel.
  • Both parties will receive a written outcome determination letter of the proceedings that will include a finding of fact, conclusion of policy violation, rationale for decisions, any disciplinary sanctions or outcomes, and appeal information.
  • The respondent and complainant has the right to submit an appeal based on the outcome determination letter.
  • The university will maintain a recording of the proceedings.

Return to the Student Code of Conduct.

You must have Author or Collection Owner permission to create Guru Cards. Contact your team's Guru admins to use this template.